US homeowners to pay more for recycling

Signal of change / US homeowners to pay more for recycling

By Ella-Louise Micallef / 12 Jun 2018

As a consequence of China’s new contaminate limit, US households are likely to see a rise in the costs of recycling.

At the beginning of 2017, China imposed a new contaminate limit of 0.5% on all waste imports. With approximately 20% of US waste consisting of contaminants, it can now no longer be exported to China, leaving it up to domestic recycling industry to undertake the costly and tedious process of separation.

In order to combat rising costs, municipal governments are reconsidering what they will and will not be recycled, and how much homeowners will now pay for the service. It is likely many counties will no longer recycle things like mixed plastic, as it is not financially viable. They are also looking to pass on any additional costs of recycling to homeowners, rather than requiring manufacturers to take responsibility for the disposal or recovery of their products and packaging as is the case in much of Europe.

Sacramento County is already seeing the effects: it used to earn $1.2 million a year selling scrap, and is now set to pay $1 million to process its waste.

So what?

With homeowners being forced to bare the brunt of additional costs, instead of manufacturers, more needs to be done to educate citizens on how to properly separate out their waste - and accumulate less in the first place. Without this, the environmental repercussions could prove to be extensive. Already there has been a large increase in the use of landfills, and this shows no signs of slowing down.

Will this additional cost to citizens encourage them to take more care when separating waste, or will it deter them from recycling all together?

Sources

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/recycling-once-embraced-by-businesses-and-environmentalists-now-under-siege/ar-AAxclAb

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/04/20/weak-markets-make-consumers-wishful-recycling-big-problem/100654976/

What might the implications of this be? What related signals of change have you seen?

Please register or log in to comment.

Suggested