Biodiversity loss

There has been a massive loss of wildlife in the last 50 years, as habitats have been destroyed and exploitation of nature has been accelerated.

The number of animals on earth has halved since 1970, described by researchers as a “biological annihilation”. The Stockholm Resilience Centre, which defines biodiversity as a key planetary boundary, estimates we have now crossed crucial thresholds. Symptoms of this ecosystem decline include deteriorating soil quality, species loss, shrinking fish stocks and deforestation. As ecosystems deteriorate, so too does their ability to provide the essential services that we rely on, thereby posing an existential threat to human civilisation. The severity of the current crisis is on a par with climate change, though climate change receives up to eight times more attention in the media. “Without biodiversity, there is no future for humanity,” says Prof David Macdonald, at Oxford University.

Biodiversity is the variety and complexity of life on earth. It has an immense intrinsic value, as well as providing the building blocks of ecosystems we depend on for essential goods and services that sustain both human and non-human life. As Damian Carrington writes, “A single spoonful of soil – which ultimately provides 90% of all food – contains 10,000 to 50,000 different types of bacteria”. Everything from the provision of food, fuel and fibre to climatic regulation and the purification of air and water depends on the ‘services’ of healthy, biodiverse ecosystems. Without these fully-functioning ecosystems, key industries such as agriculture, pharmaceuticals and even luxuries like cosmetics won’t survive for long. Nor will we.

Read the full description+

Current trajectory

Threatened ecosystems

The global decline in biodiversity is reflected in the following ways:


Species loss

Soil degradation  

Threats to carbon sinks

Loss of fish stocks


Biodiversity loss has significant and wide-ranging implications for the future of humanity. It is both symptomatic of the breakdown of major human systems, and will contribute further to their breakdown. The implications are vast; these are merely some starting points:  


For food and all crop-dependent sectors:

Biodiversity loss is an immediate and vital concern for subsistence farmers, who depend on diverse ecosystems for their livelihoods. The food system as a whole faces severe disruption, through impacts on soil health and pollinators, affecting yield, and the loss of crop resilience in the face of disease outbreaks. All sectors dependent on crops, including fashion and textiles, will be affected.


For business and regulators:

Business value is also undermined when ecosystem services that companies rely upon become degraded. The costs of raw materials can soar, hitting supply and profit margins. Businesses also risk their social and regulatory license to operate for their contribution to ecosystem crises and failure to act.  

In future, campaign groups and regulators are likely to push harder for businesses to include biodiversity and ecosystems in their accounting practices, thereby changing investment decisions. Various methods for valuing biodiversity and ecosystems are emerging.


For governance and society:

Biodiversity loss also has implications for our enjoyment of the natural world and also for cultural heritage. Take, for instance, the Ohia forests of Hawaii, a keystone of Big Island’s native ecosystem. Ohia trees can live for 600 years, but in 2016 faced a major plague referred to locally as ‘tree Ebola’ . The tree’s name is traditionally used to designate strength, sanctity and beauty, and was used to build canoes, spears, homes, temples and towers, according to Sam ‘Ohu Gon, senior scientist and cultural advisor for the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii.

Governments, NGOs, businesses and societies around the world are also paying more attention to biodiversity, and working on the systemic restoration of degraded environments through innovative practices, such as regenerative agriculture.

Contribute / add your thoughts here

The debate is moving on rapidly, such that we need to reframe the arguments in terms of natural capital. Traditional approaches to nature conservation may see some battles won, but we are losing the war: biodiversity continues to be in decline. Opportunities exist for truly sustainable development to achieve net gains for natural capital, either on- or off-site. The conservation sector needs to work ever more closely with the infrastructure/construction sector
1 user has voted.
Please register or log in to comment.